- From: Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:03:05 -0700
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4d2fac900909290803m6ccbc9cbl85870eee6de046a2@mail.gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> Date: Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:17 PM Subject: Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> Cc: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, es-discuss < es-discuss@mozilla.org> On Sep 28, 2009, at 2:06 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: On Sep 28, 2009, at 01:19 , Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > >> On Sep 27, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Robin Berjon wrote: >> >>> If at all possible I'd rather it went to LC ASAP, and if needed that new >>> stuff be done in a branched document. >>> >> >> Based on the conversation so far, I expect Web IDL in roughly its current >> state would not survive Last Call. >> > > Which is fine, being grilled through LC is progress. I would just like to > avoid piling up even more things that it needs to do. > We're supposed to do our best to address likely objections before Last Call. - Maciej _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss -- Cheers, --MarkM
Received on Tuesday, 29 September 2009 15:03:49 UTC