- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:36:04 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: Gareth Oakes <goakes@gpsl.co>, Peter Murray-Rust <pm286@cam.ac.uk>, W3C Scholarly HTML CG <public-scholarlyhtml@w3.org>
> On 18 Mar 2016, at 17:10, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote: > > On 17/03/2016 21:22 , Gareth Oakes wrote: >> Firstly I agree that it would be very helpful to build a validation rule >> set for this, as an expression of the boundaries of ScholarlyHTML. I >> know it’s a bit early to have it all nailed down at this stage, and >> would certainly take concerted effort. > > A first step for this would be to use the HTML validator. It's not > constraining enough, but it would certainly already catch issues. The > only problem with that is that it only supports RDFa Lite, whereas SH > uses a little bit of RDFa Full. Ideally, I'd like to get rid of that and > rely only on Lite — input on achieving this welcome. @darobin, can you point out which are the features that are not RDFa Lite? I am happy to look at it (though I cannot promise that something can be found)
Received on Friday, 18 March 2016 16:36:19 UTC