Re: How to organise?

Hi Robin,

> How do you prefer to organise? Here are some proposals:
> 
> • We use a repo on GitHub and largely discuss through issues (at least
> for the concrete stuff). We can ask for w3c/scholarly-html and publish
> it off there.

I personally would like this option.

> • I would suggest we use ReSpec as the format. We could also use the SH
> as defined by itself but the problem with that is that every time you
> change a definition you have to edit the parts of the document that use
> it.

I totally agree with Ivan here: ReSpec first, and then SH when we will have something enough stable.

> • Should we start in stages, first building the HTML structure, then
> overlaying semantics

Maybe the approach suggested by John and Johannes in another topic (https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-scholarlyhtml/2015Dec/0035.html), i.e., identifying which elements (from a structural semantics point of view) we would like to have “on board” and thinking about how to best have them represented in HTML, would be a valuable approach. Is it that you mean about “semantics” in this context?

Have a nice day :-)

S.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Silvio Peroni, Ph.D.
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
University of Bologna, Bologna (Italy)
Tel: +39 051 2094871
E-mail: silvio.peroni@unibo.it
Web: http://www.essepuntato.it
Twitter: essepuntato