- From: Hans Polak <info@polak.es>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 07:50:26 +0200
- To: Michael Arnwine <vsmike2500@gmail.com>, Jason Pelish <jason@massiveimpressions.com>
- CC: Martin Bean <martin@martinbean.co.uk>, public-schemaorg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <D865D281-DDCC-4A14-8BCF-15B965AA33DE@polak.es>
Hi, I think it's easy to find that information. https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aschema.org+train Cheers, Hans On June 21, 2022 12:16:14 AM GMT+02:00, Michael Arnwine <vsmike2500@gmail.com> wrote: >One question, does schema.org support the transportation industry. I am >looking for a standard that support this domain. Specifically in air, >rail, road, and oceanic. > >On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 3:52 PM Jason Pelish <jason@massiveimpressions.com> >wrote: > >> Ahh that explains why it wasn't described as a sub-type. Lol. >> As a Property, Character uses Person in context. But what if I am curating >> a page dedicated to a character, where the MainEntity is only the >> character? >> Is Abraham Lincoln a "character"? Most people, using the fictional >> definition of character, would say "no". And if all you had was the SD >> definitions currently you'd probably conclude "no" to the same question. >> >> But what about "Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter"? Is that a character now >> because a role we can all agree is fictional is applied to him? All this >> grey area and interpretation would make the process of concluding >> "character or not character" difficult to program or develop a flowchart >> around. >> >> Again, thanks for clarifying that. 👍 >> -JP >> >> Jason Pelish >> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022, 2:15 PM Martin Bean <martin@martinbean.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> “character” isn’t a type. It’s a *property* of the CreativeWork type. If >>> you look at https://schema.org/character, it says that values are still >>> expected to be of the type Person. >>> >>> On 20 Jun 2022, at 19:09, Jason Pelish <jason@massiveimpressions.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Thank you for pointing that out. I was not aware of Character. In fact, >>> I believed Person had no sub-types. What would be the name for a Person who >>> isn't a character. >>> >>> I was thinking about this more in the context of Patanjali's sutras on >>> types of Knowledge and whether knowledge is first hand or second hand. >>> >>> I was thinking about these qualifications, these values for a >>> yet-to-be-named Property of Thing: >>> >>> The general idea is that the existence of things should be qualified. >>> >>> In cases of publishing SD the publisher is aware of existence of the >>> thing being described via: >>> A. 3rd or greater party accounts & testimony >>> B. Direct 2nd hand testimony from people with first hand experience. >>> C. 1st hand experience of a said thing >>> D. Naught HAND experience when the describer is the described, when the >>> Schema is for Person and the Person is the Publisher/Author >>> >>> Also when something is know to be fictional we can qualify it as >>> 1. Testimony of having invented, imagined or described a thing without >>> bringing a real world instance of the thing into existence. >>> 2. 2nd hand acounts of people who have claimed to invent, imagine or >>> describe the thing being described. >>> 3. Accounts of the thing being described where the origin or existence is >>> uncertain. >>> >>> For example, what could be more authoritative information about a Person >>> above what comes from the Person themselves? Who would be more certain >>> that Harry Potter isn't a real wizard lad than J.K. Rowling? Hearing from >>> the actual person "I am real" and hearing from the inventor of a character >>> "this is all from my imagination" is a lot more reliable than hearing from >>> other sources. No? >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022, 12:04 PM Hans Polak <info@polak.es> wrote: >>> >>>> Good afternoon, >>>> >>>> I'm not an expert, but https://schema.org/character is for fictional >>>> characters. >>>> >>>> Then, there's also https://schema.org/Intangible, and >>>> https://schema.org/object. >>>> >>>> The https://schema.org/Class type also exists. >>>> >>>> Yours sincerely, >>>> Hans Polak >>>> >>>> On 19/6/22 1:20, jason@massiveimpressions.com wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello Everyone, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The schema for Person is described to be applicable to: >>>> “A person (alive, dead, undead, or fictional).” >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> But… what Property of Person, or any other Thing for that matter, >>>> indicates whether the Thing actually exists, is instanced in reality, has >>>> real presence as opposed to being only entirely imaginary or fictional? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Shouldn’t this be explicit, not implied by other Properties or some >>>> other Type or Sub-type? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -JP >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jason Pelish >>>> >>>> Founding Partner – Marketer >>>> >>>> Massive Impressions Online Marketing >>>> >>>> Boca Raton, FL 33431 >>>> >>>> (561) 232-2424 >>>> >>>> (866) 800-3579 >>>> https://2vu.me/m - Massive Impressions site >>>> >>>> https://2vu.me/C - The Click Whisperer site >>>> >>>> https://4boca.com – 4boca Local site >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2022 05:50:44 UTC