Re: Annotating terms of services

Hello Richard,

Thank you!

Point 1. is definitely exactly what we need at stage, ensuring at the 
very least consistency :-)
Ok for Point 2, we'll be moving on then.

Alain

Le 10/11/2020 à 12:32, Richard Wallis a écrit :
> Alain,
>
> Good to see the work in this area.
>
> In answer to your questions:
>
>  1. I will take a look and contribute to the forum.  A quick glance
>     indicates that proposals may benefit from a little input
>     around the general style of approach in Schema.org.
>  2. In general terms the process operates thus:
>       * Discussion either on this discussion list or via issue(s)
>         raised on the Schema.org Github repo
>         <https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg> come to a
>         consensus as to the need for, proposed approach, and detail of
>         additions and changes to the vocabulary. This could be
>         anything from minor changes to the wording of term
>         descriptions, additional example scenarios, through to the
>         definition of a set of new Types & Properties.
>       * For any significant changes, a definition of the proposed
>         terms plus associated examples is created in a forked version
>         of the repository.
>       * A Pull Request to merge those changes into the codebase is
>         submitted
>       * If successful the Request is merged into the code base and the
>         changes appear in the next release of the vocabulary
>
>
> ~Richard.
>
> Richard Wallis
> Founder, Data Liberate
> http://dataliberate.com
> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
> Twitter: @rjw
>
>
>
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 09:54, ALain <alain.couillault@apoliade.com 
> <mailto:alain.couillault@apoliade.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     We have been working for a while on the description of legal
>     documents
>     such as Privacy Notices and Terms of Services. You will find more
>     on our
>     website here: http://www.legicrowd.org/.
>     We are currently working on some possible extension to schema.org
>     <http://schema.org>: in
>     short, to properly describe such pages, we need to add some generic
>     types (for example LegalDocument) and types and properties which are
>     more specific (like personal data related types).
>
>     You can find our work in progress at this page:
>     http://www.legicrowd.org/schema/ and here
>     http://www.legicrowd.org/index.php/mark-up-for-terms-of-services-and-privacy-notices/.
>
>     So I have two questions:
>     1. the more the merrier! For each modification (proposed type or
>     change
>     in existing type), there is a forum for comments and discussions. Any
>     feedback will be more than welcome!
>     2. I sort of read the schema.org <http://schema.org> website and I
>     am not quite sure what
>     the process is to propose extensions to the existing schema.org
>     <http://schema.org>. Could
>     anyone provide some 'enlightments'.
>
>     Happy annotating!
>
>     Dr Alain Couillault
>     APIL
>     LegiCrowd Projet Leader
>