- From: Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 17:50:57 +0100
- To: public-schemaorg@w3.org
- Cc: Guha Guha <guha@google.com>
- Message-Id: <05121739-68A4-41BF-98A4-40C0A15E4A13@gmail.com>
Hi all: Please note that the Vehicle class I designed for the automotive part of schema.org was meant to include watercrafts and aircrafts. The auto parts of schema.org were actually derived from this predecessor: http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/vso/ns Best Martin --------------------------------------- martin hepp www: http://www.heppnetz.de/ email: mhepp@computer.org >> Am 10.02.2020 um 17:25 schrieb Guha <guha@google.com>: >> > > Actually, could we pause a bit ... I am not comfortable introducing incredibly specific vocabulary such as 'boatName'. > > guha > >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 7:43 AM Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: >> LGTM, let's do it. Can you send a pull request? I think this case since the pattern is long established let's skip Pending.schema.org and target the core (i.e. data/schema.rdfa in the GitHub repository) >> >> Dan >> >>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2020, 11:27 Magico Martinez, <magico@apple.com> wrote: >>> As fili spotted (back in 2017!) the current vocabulary has types for buses, trains, taxis, etc but it’s missing any vocabulary around boat trips or boat reservations. >>> >>> I’ve put together a proposal for this. It would add http://schema.org/BoatTerminal, http://schema.org/BoatReservation, and http://schema.org/BoatTrip which are consistent with other types. >>> >>> Proposal: https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1755#issuecomment-583140913 >>> >>> Would love to read any feedback or comments on this proposal. >>> >>> Magico Martinez
Received on Monday, 10 February 2020 16:51:02 UTC