W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > February 2020

Proposal: BoatTerminal, BoatReservation, BoatTrip

From: Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 17:50:57 +0100
Message-Id: <05121739-68A4-41BF-98A4-40C0A15E4A13@gmail.com>
Cc: Guha Guha <guha@google.com>
To: public-schemaorg@w3.org
Hi all:
Please note that the Vehicle class I designed for the automotive part of schema.org was meant to include watercrafts and aircrafts.

The auto parts of schema.org were actually derived from this predecessor:

    http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/vso/ns

Best
Martin 

---------------------------------------
martin hepp
www:  http://www.heppnetz.de/
email: mhepp@computer.org


>> Am 10.02.2020 um 17:25 schrieb Guha <guha@google.com>:
>> 
> 
> Actually, could we pause a bit ... I am not comfortable introducing incredibly specific vocabulary such as 'boatName'.
> 
> guha
> 
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 7:43 AM Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>> LGTM, let's do it. Can you send a pull request? I think this case since the pattern is long established let's skip Pending.schema.org and target the core (i.e. data/schema.rdfa in the GitHub repository)
>> 
>> Dan
>> 
>>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2020, 11:27 Magico Martinez, <magico@apple.com> wrote:
>>> As fili spotted (back in 2017!) the current vocabulary has types for buses, trains, taxis, etc but it’s missing any vocabulary around boat trips or boat reservations.
>>> 
>>> I’ve put together a proposal for this. It would add http://schema.org/BoatTerminal, http://schema.org/BoatReservation, and http://schema.org/BoatTrip which are consistent with other types. 
>>> 
>>> Proposal: https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1755#issuecomment-583140913 
>>> 
>>> Would love to read any feedback or comments on this proposal. 
>>> 
>>> Magico Martinez

Received on Monday, 10 February 2020 16:51:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 10 February 2020 16:51:03 UTC