W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > February 2020

Re: Proposal: BoatTerminal, BoatReservation, BoatTrip

From: Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 17:49:22 +0100
Message-Id: <5C2196B8-C3FC-4106-9F17-A5B73834F61E@gmail.com>
Cc: public-schemaorg@w3.org
To: Magico Martinez <magico@apple.com>
IMO, we should try to focus on a generic vocabulary for all kinds if trips and not create subtypes for each type of vehicle. A common conceptual model for boat, bus, helicopter, passenger plane, etc. trips should be doable, and we will actually already have necessary elements in schema.org.

We only need subtypes if the computational handling by major consumers of the data will be based on the new distinction. Also, subtypes make composite trips and trips with an unspecified means on transportation cumbersome to model.

martin hepp
www:  http://www.heppnetz.de/
email: mhepp@computer.org

> Am 10.02.2020 um 16:27 schrieb Magico Martinez <magico@apple.com>:
> As fili spotted (back in 2017!) the current vocabulary has types for buses, trains, taxis, etc but it’s missing any vocabulary around boat trips or boat reservations.
> I’ve put together a proposal for this. It would add http://schema.org/BoatTerminal, http://schema.org/BoatReservation, and http://schema.org/BoatTrip which are consistent with other types. 
> Proposal: https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1755#issuecomment-583140913 
> Would love to read any feedback or comments on this proposal. 
> Magico Martinez

Received on Monday, 10 February 2020 16:49:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 10 February 2020 16:49:29 UTC