- From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:26:21 -0500
- To: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAChbWaME3QdfZ4ra27pbd3hac_HER8cX+_k1pDRq16UXBd5UMg@mail.gmail.com>
*Problem: *"URL" versus "Url" is showing up in the wild west of our Linked Data web. Some properties, because of strict naming conventions we have, currently cause some breakage across the Linked Data web (but how much is anyone's guess). *Solution:* It seems there's a few Properties might be best served with a 301 Redirect ? https://schema.org/thumbnailURL --> https://schema.org/thumbnailUrl http://schema.org/contentURL --> http://schema.org/contentUrl http://schema.org/discussionURL --> http://schema.org/discussionUrl http://schema.org/downloadURL --> http://schema.org/downloadUrl http://schema.org/embedURL --> http://schema.org/embedUrl http://schema.org/installURL --> http://schema.org/installUrl http://schema.org/isBasedOnURL --> http://schema.org/isBasedOnUrl http://schema.org/paymentURL --> http://schema.org/paymentUrl http://schema.org/replyToURL --> http://schema.org/replyToUrl http://schema.org/serviceURL --> http://schema.org/serviceUrl http://schema.org/targetURL --> http://schema.org/targetUrl http://schema.org/trackingURL --> http://schema.org/trackingUrl *Questions:* 1. Could 301 Redirects be implemented for a few items on Schema.org? 2. Should 301 Redirects be implemented ? - Maybe this makes developers and publishers too lazy? - Maybe it helps consumers more, (things not breaking as often) and that's good for all? - How do others feel about that? Thad https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2020 15:26:49 UTC