sch:rangeIncludes / sch:domainIncludes vs rdfs:range / rdfs:domain

Hello,

Perhaps I am missing something, but reading about rdfs:range and
rdfs:domain at https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/ and looking at how
sch:rangeIncludes and sch:domainIncludes are used, it would seem they are
expressing the same concepts.

If this is accurate, why did schema.org not adopt rdfs:range and
rdfs:domain? Why create sch:rangeIncludes and sch:domainIncludes?

Thank you,
James