W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > January 2019

Re: Gift property in schema.org

From: Bebemovil <info@bebemovil.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:43:31 +0100
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Cc: Michael Andrews <nextcontent01@gmail.com>, Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1e8ee418-6c85-0326-6d53-361f2ba7fb38@bebemovil.com>
Ok Dan, thank you so much.
Regards


El 07/01/2019 a las 17:31, Dan Brickley escribió:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 16:26, Bebemovil <info@bebemovil.com 
> <mailto:info@bebemovil.com>> wrote:
>
>     Best regards for everyone.
>
>     Finally we have decided put "addOn" property to indicates "+ Gift"
>     value in Offer item.
>
>     One question: Does anyone  know if google will add this property
>     as rich snippet in SERPs?
>
> We try not to get too deep into search-engine specific discussions 
> here, especially when speculative. As things stand afaik we don't use 
> "addOn" for product snippets or similar. If we do something it should 
> show up in Google's structured data markup documentation.
>
> Dan
>
>     Thanks in advance
>
>
>     El 07/01/2019 a las 13:07, Dan Brickley escribió:
>>     Yeah, this sounds plausible as a modelinf idiom. As ever I'd
>>     suggest - in the absence of other guidance - to lean towards the
>>     laziest option. Schema.org was fundamentally intended to be
>>     *easy* for publishers. If some consuming app asks for gift
>>     aspects to be explicitly modelled, that would be a good reason to
>>     put more time into breaking out those details...
>>
>>     Dan
>>
>>     On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, 11:46 Michael Andrews
>>     <nextcontent01@gmail.com <mailto:nextcontent01@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>         +1 for Richard's suggestion regarding using addOn.  That
>>         makes sense, and could cover a range of scenarios.
>>
>>         On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 4:59 PM Richard Wallis
>>         <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com
>>         <mailto:richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>> wrote:
>>
>>             Thinking about it a little further...
>>
>>             Potentially the Offer <https://schema.org/Offer>
>>             describing the 'gift' could be be an addOn
>>             <https://schema.org/addOn> to an offer to purchase.
>>
>>             ~Richard.
>>             Richard Wallis
>>             Founder, Data Liberate
>>             http://dataliberate.com
>>             Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
>>             Twitter: @rjw
>>
>>
>>
>>             On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 11:17, Dan Brickley
>>             <danbri@google.com <mailto:danbri@google.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>                 On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, 10:43 Bebemovil
>>                 <info@bebemovil.com <mailto:info@bebemovil.com> wrote:
>>
>>                     Hi friends.
>>
>>                     We are a baby online shop and we have offers with
>>                     gifts included.
>>
>>                     We have not encountered a gift property to
>>                     indicates to google that our
>>                     offer includes a gift for buyer totally free.
>>
>>                     How can we do it? to google serp shows rich
>>                     snippets of gifts
>>
>>
>>                 We haven't really gone into that level of detail. For
>>                 now, it would be simplest to just summarize any
>>                 "gift" aspects of an offer within its textual
>>                 description.
>>
>>                 Dan
>>
>>
>>                     Regards
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Monday, 7 January 2019 16:43:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 7 January 2019 16:43:59 UTC