W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > August 2019

Re: Using Comment to indicates comments

From: Marijane White <whimar@ohsu.edu>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 23:31:50 +0000
To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7867F08D-4CA4-457B-9B48-C443BF363805@ohsu.edu>
Mark,

Since a Comment is a CreativeWork, could you use Comment to mark up each individual comment and then use hasPart/isPartOf to relate them to a set of comments as a CreativeWorkSeries?  Or, since CreativeWorkSeries is kind of an abstract class used to organize its subtypes, perhaps a set of comments could be a Conversation, which also can be used with hasPart/isPartOf?


Marijane White, M.S.L.I.S.
Data Librarian, Assistant Professor
Oregon Health & Science University Library
 
Phone: 503.494.3484
Email: whimar@ohsu.edu
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5059-4132


´╗┐On 2019/08/19, 4:12 PM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

    Hello,
    
    Is this community alive?
    
    Cheers,
    
    
    > On 28 Jun 2019, at 2:22 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
    > 
    > Hi schema folk,
    > 
    > I've been looking for a way to indicate what parts of a Web page are comments; see <https://discourse.wicg.io/t/proposal-comments-element/3483> for the use case.
    > 
    > I see that something in this area is already defined at <https://schema.org/Comment>, but it's not quite what I'd like; I want to mark the *set* of comments + commenting UX, not just an individual comment.
    > 
    > Would it be horribly abusive if a page were to do something like:
    > 
    > """
    > <div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Comment">
    > 
    >  <h3>Comments</h3>
    > 
    >  <div class="comment_css">
    >  [ comment ]
    >  </div>
    > 
    >  <div class="comment_css">
    >  [ comment ]
    >  </div>
    > 
    >  <div class="add_comment_css">
    >  [ add a comment UX ]
    >  </div>
    > 
    > </div>
    > """
    > 
    > ? 
    > 
    > Is there a better way to do this (including defining a new type)?
    > 
    > Cheers,
    > 
    > 
    > --
    > Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

    > 
    > 
    
    --
    Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

    
    
    

Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2019 23:32:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:12:48 UTC