W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > August 2019

Re: Question about Educational content structure

From: Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:31:14 +0100
To: public-schemaorg@w3.org
Message-ID: <c3c9e41b-b707-fa48-b3af-52241774b7f0@pjjk.co.uk>
The relationship you're after is probably not workExample, unless the 
video is a representation of the same intellectual content as the 
textbook but in a different medium.

If you consider the test and video to be part of the content of the 
textbook, use hasPart. We're not paper-bound anymore so it's OK for 
videos to be parts of books.

{ ...
   "@type": "TextBook",
   "hasPart" : {
     "@type": "Chapter",
     "hasPart": [
        { "@type": "Video" },
         "@type": "CreativeWork",
         "learningResourceType": "Assessment"

If the Video and assessment are not parts of the textbook then (as far 
as schema.org is concerned) they're just other stand-alone but linked 

A couple of things you might be interested in are:

- K12OCX <https://k12ocx.github.io/k12ocx-specs/>, a spec for marking up 
complex learning content such as courses (textbooks are similar)

- some ongoing efforts in LRMI <https://www.dublincore.org/about/lrmi/> 
to define a concept scheme for learning resource types 
(sorry, you'll have to trawl the DC-LRMI Task Group mail archive 
<https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=DC-LRMI> for discussions 
about that and why we avoid terms like 'video' and 'text')

Phil (convenor of DCMI Learning Resource Metadata Initiative task group)

On 14/08/2019 11:06, Ghaulser Rigoti wrote:
> I have a web site for educational content. Since we use Book type in 
> the home page and chapter in the pages, I would like to know the best 
> way to descrive the links of the page. Like: I have in the chapter 
> page a link to another webpage with exercises, another link to a 
> youtube video, another link to a podcast... all of those resources are 
> in external sites. So, from my page, how do I have to do the relation 
> ship?
> The json-ld for the pages are
> {
>   .
>   .
>   .
>   "workExample":  [
>     {
>       "@type": "CreativeWork",
>       "url": "www.example.com/exercise <http://www.example.com/exercise>",
>       "learningResourceType": "Test",
>     },
>     {
>       "@type": "CreativeWork",
>       "url": "www.example.com/video <http://www..example.com/video>",
>       "learningResourceType": "Video"
>     },
>   ]
>   .
>   .
>   .
> }
> Is it correct to do it in this way? Any Suggestion?
> Regards

Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil
CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk>: a cooperative consultancy for 
innovation in education technology.
PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning; 
information systems for education.

CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in 
England number OC399090
PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, 
number SC569282.
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2019 14:31:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:12:48 UTC