- From: Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:31:14 +0100
- To: public-schemaorg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <c3c9e41b-b707-fa48-b3af-52241774b7f0@pjjk.co.uk>
The relationship you're after is probably not workExample, unless the
video is a representation of the same intellectual content as the
textbook but in a different medium.
If you consider the test and video to be part of the content of the
textbook, use hasPart. We're not paper-bound anymore so it's OK for
videos to be parts of books.
{ ...
"@type": "TextBook",
"hasPart" : {
"@type": "Chapter",
"hasPart": [
{ "@type": "Video" },
{
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"learningResourceType": "Assessment"
}
]
}
}
If the Video and assessment are not parts of the textbook then (as far
as schema.org is concerned) they're just other stand-alone but linked
resources.
A couple of things you might be interested in are:
- K12OCX <https://k12ocx.github.io/k12ocx-specs/>, a spec for marking up
complex learning content such as courses (textbooks are similar)
- some ongoing efforts in LRMI <https://www.dublincore.org/about/lrmi/>
to define a concept scheme for learning resource types
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pTZd1AQMdh52otziC_s_-iE3JZOPHSVOP_6D7Bk247I/edit#heading=h.dbbp5570samf>
(sorry, you'll have to trawl the DC-LRMI Task Group mail archive
<https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=DC-LRMI> for discussions
about that and why we avoid terms like 'video' and 'text')
Phil (convenor of DCMI Learning Resource Metadata Initiative task group)
On 14/08/2019 11:06, Ghaulser Rigoti wrote:
> I have a web site for educational content. Since we use Book type in
> the home page and chapter in the pages, I would like to know the best
> way to descrive the links of the page. Like: I have in the chapter
> page a link to another webpage with exercises, another link to a
> youtube video, another link to a podcast... all of those resources are
> in external sites. So, from my page, how do I have to do the relation
> ship?
>
> The json-ld for the pages are
> {
> .
> .
> .
> "workExample": [
> {
> "@type": "CreativeWork",
> "url": "www.example.com/exercise <http://www.example.com/exercise>",
> "learningResourceType": "Test",
> },
> {
> "@type": "CreativeWork",
> "url": "www.example.com/video <http://www..example.com/video>",
> "learningResourceType": "Video"
> },
> ]
> .
> .
> .
> }
>
> Is it correct to do it in this way? Any Suggestion?
>
> Regards
--
Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil
CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk>: a cooperative consultancy for
innovation in education technology.
PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning;
information systems for education.
CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in
England number OC399090
PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company,
number SC569282.
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2019 14:31:59 UTC