- From: Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:31:14 +0100
- To: public-schemaorg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <c3c9e41b-b707-fa48-b3af-52241774b7f0@pjjk.co.uk>
The relationship you're after is probably not workExample, unless the video is a representation of the same intellectual content as the textbook but in a different medium. If you consider the test and video to be part of the content of the textbook, use hasPart. We're not paper-bound anymore so it's OK for videos to be parts of books. { ... "@type": "TextBook", "hasPart" : { "@type": "Chapter", "hasPart": [ { "@type": "Video" }, { "@type": "CreativeWork", "learningResourceType": "Assessment" } ] } } If the Video and assessment are not parts of the textbook then (as far as schema.org is concerned) they're just other stand-alone but linked resources. A couple of things you might be interested in are: - K12OCX <https://k12ocx.github.io/k12ocx-specs/>, a spec for marking up complex learning content such as courses (textbooks are similar) - some ongoing efforts in LRMI <https://www.dublincore.org/about/lrmi/> to define a concept scheme for learning resource types <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pTZd1AQMdh52otziC_s_-iE3JZOPHSVOP_6D7Bk247I/edit#heading=h.dbbp5570samf> (sorry, you'll have to trawl the DC-LRMI Task Group mail archive <https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=DC-LRMI> for discussions about that and why we avoid terms like 'video' and 'text') Phil (convenor of DCMI Learning Resource Metadata Initiative task group) On 14/08/2019 11:06, Ghaulser Rigoti wrote: > I have a web site for educational content. Since we use Book type in > the home page and chapter in the pages, I would like to know the best > way to descrive the links of the page. Like: I have in the chapter > page a link to another webpage with exercises, another link to a > youtube video, another link to a podcast... all of those resources are > in external sites. So, from my page, how do I have to do the relation > ship? > > The json-ld for the pages are > { > . > . > . > "workExample": [ > { > "@type": "CreativeWork", > "url": "www.example.com/exercise <http://www.example.com/exercise>", > "learningResourceType": "Test", > }, > { > "@type": "CreativeWork", > "url": "www.example.com/video <http://www..example.com/video>", > "learningResourceType": "Video" > }, > ] > . > . > . > } > > Is it correct to do it in this way? Any Suggestion? > > Regards -- Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk>: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education technology. PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning; information systems for education. CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in England number OC399090 PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, number SC569282.
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2019 14:31:59 UTC