- From: Quico Prol <franprol@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 19:26:23 +0100
- To: public-schemaorg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAJExmmVoV8xV6KoH+7iPtZB9Z=sgG91JL+T_=7F8f_CxKQSgDg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, TL:TR Asking for general guidelines/opions about use https://schema.org/Product on this https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiObject thanks No TL:TR I'm Quico from Spain I'm part of some social iniciatives, a small engineering company, and also work for public administration. Among the things I like are data, open source and self-paced contributing. During some time I was trying to make happen a kind of Wikipedia of Objects, where all product data were structured, open and free avaliable. First attemp was set with a friend an old pc cluster running apache cassandra to relate items in RDF style in 2012, what was a complete disaster. After discover Wikidata I felt that something like a Wikipedia of Objects should run over Wikidata for a lot of reasons: same philosophy, infraestructure ready, not reinventing wheel, etc ... so I started to make proof of concepts on wikidata, here an example: https://tools.wmflabs.org/reasonator/?&q=26205901 everything is explaneid here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiObject Then I re-discover schema.org and Extensions make me start questioning that could be good to define specific vocabaries/extensions for each type of object, like LED Lamps <https://tools.wmflabs.org/reasonator/?&q=1553201> with their own properties (Luminous intensity <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P3041>) so people could start sharing objects information as schema.org does greetings
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2018 21:26:45 UTC