Re: Missing categories

Good morning Mike,

You can always use my ontology tool <http://polak.es/en/ontology.html> 
to create valid Microformat, RDFa, or JSON-LD output formats.

Yours sincerely,
Hans Polak

On 03/08/2018 01:01 AM, Richard Wallis wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Right place, valid questions.
>
> What would you propose - subtype(s) of Organization, specific 
> properties beyond those inherited from Organization?  Example pages 
> etc. would be useful.
>
> ~Richard.
>
>
>
>
>
> Richard Wallis
> Founder, Data Liberate
> http://dataliberate.com
> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
> Twitter: @rjw
>
> On 6 March 2018 at 20:38, Mike Hart <mike@gavrillo.co.uk 
> <mailto:mike@gavrillo.co.uk>> wrote:
>
>     Hi
>     I'm not a big expert on this, so apologies in advance if I'm
>     either repeating stuff that other people have said, or not making
>     sense.  It seems to me that there is a big hole in the schema. 
>     Political organisations are not represented.  There is NGO and
>     workersunion, but there are many other grassroots and formal
>     political organisations that can't be expressed.  Here in the UK
>     we have three major political organisations: the Conservatives,
>     Labour and the Liberal Democrats, but there is no category for a
>     political party.  Surely it should be
>     Organisation/politicalparty.  The organisation that I would like
>     to add micro data for advocates for people in the care system in a
>     London borough.  I can express the location, but where's the
>     organisation/political/lobbygroup or whatever?
>     If I'm not going about this in the right way, perhaps you'd be
>     kind enough to point me in the right direction.  If I've
>     misunderstood the schema would you be kind enough to point out my
>     error.  If I'm doing this in the right way, then thanks for your
>     time and attention.  I look forward to any consequent changes.
>     Kind regards
>     Mike Hart
>
>