W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > March 2018

Re: Missing categories

From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 00:01:16 +0000
Message-ID: <CAD47Kz7Dpt8yAkKfAmioPQoMRzTs6Vq-q-9yTTsfKFM7M5aUKg@mail.gmail.com>
To: mike@gavrillo.co.uk
Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
Hi Mike,

Right place, valid questions.

What would you propose - subtype(s) of Organization, specific properties
beyond those inherited from Organization?  Example pages etc. would be


Richard Wallis
Founder, Data Liberate
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
Twitter: @rjw

On 6 March 2018 at 20:38, Mike Hart <mike@gavrillo.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi
> I'm not a big expert on this, so apologies in advance if I'm either
> repeating stuff that other people have said, or not making sense.  It seems
> to me that there is a big hole in the schema.  Political organisations are
> not represented.  There is NGO and workersunion, but there are many other
> grassroots and formal political organisations that can't be expressed.
> Here in the UK we have three major political organisations: the
> Conservatives, Labour and the Liberal Democrats, but there is no category
> for a political party.  Surely it should be Organisation/politicalparty.
> The organisation that I would like to add micro data for advocates for
> people in the care system in a London borough.  I can express the location,
> but where's the organisation/political/lobbygroup or whatever?
> If I'm not going about this in the right way, perhaps you'd be kind enough
> to point me in the right direction.  If I've misunderstood the schema would
> you be kind enough to point out my error.  If I'm doing this in the right
> way, then thanks for your time and attention.  I look forward to any
> consequent changes.
> Kind regards
> Mike Hart
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2018 00:01:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:12:38 UTC