- From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 00:01:16 +0000
- To: mike@gavrillo.co.uk
- Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAD47Kz7Dpt8yAkKfAmioPQoMRzTs6Vq-q-9yTTsfKFM7M5aUKg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Mike, Right place, valid questions. What would you propose - subtype(s) of Organization, specific properties beyond those inherited from Organization? Example pages etc. would be useful. ~Richard. Richard Wallis Founder, Data Liberate http://dataliberate.com Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis Twitter: @rjw On 6 March 2018 at 20:38, Mike Hart <mike@gavrillo.co.uk> wrote: > Hi > > I'm not a big expert on this, so apologies in advance if I'm either > repeating stuff that other people have said, or not making sense. It seems > to me that there is a big hole in the schema. Political organisations are > not represented. There is NGO and workersunion, but there are many other > grassroots and formal political organisations that can't be expressed. > Here in the UK we have three major political organisations: the > Conservatives, Labour and the Liberal Democrats, but there is no category > for a political party. Surely it should be Organisation/politicalparty. > The organisation that I would like to add micro data for advocates for > people in the care system in a London borough. I can express the location, > but where's the organisation/political/lobbygroup or whatever? > > If I'm not going about this in the right way, perhaps you'd be kind enough > to point me in the right direction. If I've misunderstood the schema would > you be kind enough to point out my error. If I'm doing this in the right > way, then thanks for your time and attention. I look forward to any > consequent changes. > > Kind regards > Mike Hart > >
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2018 00:01:48 UTC