- From: Joshua Marks <jmarks@curriki.org>
- Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 11:14:32 -0700
- To: "lrmi@googlegroups.com" <lrmi@googlegroups.com>
- Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALbUb1OS1LcQ3yJNWtzVQ+Qqv7yuJwn9Te-QA6Fhv+B1zXeMCg@mail.gmail.com>
+1! This intersection of competencies, competency assertions, badges and credentials is critically important to the evaluation and evolution of educational attainment and professional certification. Happy to help however I can. Joshua Marks On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk> wrote: > Hello all, one important aspect of education that is not represented well > in schema.org is educational and occupational credentials, i.e. diplomas, > academic degrees, certifications, etc [Terms > <http://connectingcredentials.org/common-language-work-group-glossary/>]. > These act as an important link between outcomes of educational courses, > people, and occupations / job roles. I have raised an issue on github with > the aim of addressing this gap in schema.org [issue#1779 > <https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1779>] > > There has been a fair amount of work outside of schema.org on describing > these, notably by the CredentialEngine.org <http://credentialengine.org/> > [CTDL <http://credreg.net/ctdl/schema>], ConnectingCredentials.org > <http://connectingcredentials.org/> and the Open Badges [BadgeAlliance > <https://www.badgealliance.org/>]. There is also work ongoing about how > to deal with wider Verifiable Claims [VCWG > <https://www.w3.org/2017/vc/WG/>] such as the claim by and individual to > have an academic degree. Also, there are many frameworks which describe > credentials in terms of the level and extent of the knowledge and > competencies they accredit. > > What that work has made clear is that there is some complexity in > describing educational and occupational credentials. While I don't expect > doing so in schema.org would require more than a few additional terms, > the relationship between these terms and things like verifiable claims, > competencies, course objectives etc, needs to be clear. I suspect we will > need a group such as a W3C Community Group to sort these out. > > I would be interested in hearing your thoughts on this... > > Regards, Phil. > > > [issue#1779] https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1779 > > [Terms] http://connectingcredentials.org/common-language-work- > group-glossary/ > > [CTDL] http://credreg.net/ctdl/schema > > [BadgeAlliance] https://www.badgealliance.org/ > see also https://www.imsglobal.org/sites/default/files/Badges/ > OBv2p0/index.html > > [VCWG] https://www.w3.org/2017/vc/WG/ > -- > > Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil > PJJK Limited: technology to enhance learning; information systems for > education. > > PJJK Limited is registered in the UK as a private limited company, number > SC569282. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Learning Resource Metadata Initiative" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lrmi+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >
Received on Monday, 30 October 2017 11:18:09 UTC