Very broad questions but I'll have a go. In terms of core w3c recommendation-track groups defining their own schemas, the increased use of Github and the moves towards a "living spec" model are encouraging, since slow waterfall style development is rather awkward for descriptive schemas. I expect we will also see some impact of Shacl and/or Shex languages for characterising much tighter data structures than RDFS/OWL can define. Typing this on a phone on a train but hope to flesh out the latter thoughts soon. Dan On 9 Oct 2017 14:39, "Timothy Holborn" <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote: Dan, schemas are playing an increasing role in the future of standards. as an elder of the particular field, have you any view on the future of ontologies & W3C? IMHO where standards don't work without particular vocab; my thoughts are that some modern thinking likely needs to be put into it. Tim.H. On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 at 00:24 Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > To stress Charles' point once more, there are 100s of people on this list. > I fear none of them will get much out of speculation on the internal > architecture of Google's ( / YouTube's) Web infrastructure, and those of us > with some modest knowledge of it can't talk much about it anyway. That said > I strongly suspect the particular issue under discussion is simply a bug. > Out of scope for this group's real focus. > > Let's please go back to talking about standards and schemas, rather than > about Google! > > Dan > > On 9 Oct 2017 10:01, "Hans Polak" <info@polak.es> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> > However would still be interesting to know why they do that. >> >> Just a guess, but when you serve dynamic content, both speed and size >> matter. In this case, I'd venture that speed is an issue. When a request >> comes in, one check to see if it's a browser is faster than adding the >> schema.org info. >> >> A different model would result in higher speeds, but the "serve all >> requests dynamically" model is the standard. I have done some work on a >> "mixed content" server, but haven't pursued it. For organizations like >> Google, having a "mixed content" server would result in huge savings. Just >> saying. >> >> Cheers, >> Hans Polak >> >> >>Received on Monday, 9 October 2017 13:45:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:12:37 UTC