- From: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex.ru>
- Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 15:00:18 +0200
- To: public-schemaorg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <op.y7ouesfsftbnq3@desktop-kurf4r9.home>
I believe this is not a list for general discussion of SEO techniques nor Google, but rather for discussion of how Schema.org should develop. How any search engine ranks content is not entirely dependent on Schema.org - the point is that it is a tool enabling them to better understand the content presented, and thus potentially provide more reliable or useful - including more direct - results to users searching for something. cheers Chaals On Fri, 06 Oct 2017 14:22:00 +0200, DJ Floops TT <djfloopstt@gmail.com> wrote: > Felipe. > > Amp is a good way forward but in my view pagespeed as a ranking factor > is a myth. I get pagespeed scores well over 80 using google speed > insights >but websites with much lower loading scores are ranked higher > than my website. > > Thank you, > Dj Floops TT. > Soca, Chutney, Reggae & Dancehall Podcasts. > Website > > > > > >> On 6 October 2017 at 08:09, Felipe Santi <fsanti@sismotur.com> wrote: >> Hi, have you tried using AMP? >> >> https://www.ampproject.org/docs/guides/discovery >> https://www.ampproject.org/docs/getting-started/ >> >> We're planning to use Schema + AMP to increase the page loading speed >> and to enhance their discoverability by search engines. >> Kind regards, >> Felipe >> >> >> >>>>>>>> DJ Floops TT >>> 6 October 2017 at 13:57You raise a good point Jan. Is Schema really >>> necessary or is it a nice to have. I have above par schema on my >>> website yet I >>>have not gained a leverable advantage over >>> competitors in my niche. I will be discontinuing schema on my website >>> come >>>January. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Dj Floops TT. >>> Soca, Chutney, Reggae & Dancehall Podcasts. >>> Website >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > -- Chaals is Charles McCathie Nevile find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 6 October 2017 13:00:44 UTC