Re: No more Schema.org data on YouTube

I believe this is not a  list for general discussion of SEO techniques  
nor  Google, but rather for discussion of how Schema.org should develop.

How any search engine ranks content is not entirely dependent on  
Schema.org - the point is that it is a tool enabling them to better  
understand the content presented, and thus potentially provide more  
reliable or useful - including more direct - results to users searching  
for something.

cheers

Chaals

On Fri, 06 Oct 2017 14:22:00 +0200, DJ Floops TT <djfloopstt@gmail.com>  
wrote:

> Felipe.
>
> Amp is a good way forward but in my view pagespeed as a ranking factor  
> is a myth. I get pagespeed scores well over 80 using google speed  
> insights >but websites with much lower loading scores are ranked higher  
> than my website.
>
> Thank you,
> Dj Floops TT.
> Soca, Chutney, Reggae & Dancehall Podcasts.
> Website
>
>
>
>
>
>> On 6 October 2017 at 08:09, Felipe Santi <fsanti@sismotur.com> wrote:
>> Hi, have you tried using AMP?
>>
>> https://www.ampproject.org/docs/guides/discovery
>> https://www.ampproject.org/docs/getting-started/
>>
>> We're planning to use Schema + AMP to increase the page loading speed  
>> and to enhance their discoverability by search engines.
>> Kind regards,
>> Felipe
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>> DJ Floops TT
>>> 6 October 2017 at 13:57You raise a good point Jan. Is Schema really  
>>> necessary or is it a nice to have. I have above par schema on my  
>>> website yet I >>>have not gained a leverable advantage over  
>>> competitors in my niche. I will be discontinuing schema on my website  
>>> come >>>January.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Dj Floops TT.
>>> Soca, Chutney, Reggae & Dancehall Podcasts.
>>> Website
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
Chaals is Charles McCathie Nevile
find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Friday, 6 October 2017 13:00:44 UTC