- From: Chaals is Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 11:26:04 +0200
- To: public-schemaorg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <2c8a0c24-74ed-a7b5-8f6c-1a00d0f741ef@yandex-team.ru>
Yup. cheers On 09/05/17 10:47, Hans Polak wrote: > Excellent analysis. +1 > > On 05/09/2017 06:33 AM, Michael Andrews wrote: >> I see a usability issue with how Rating http://schema.org/Rating is >> applied to ClaimReview. On one hand, publishers should invert their >> scales when their own numeric systems indicate the worst rating as >> having the highest numeric value, IF the goal is for the value to be >> evaluated by an algorithm, say by a search engine, to assess the >> claim. In this case, the value is considered a number (integer) >> value, so that all numbers need to be consistent for an algorithm to >> compare them. On the other hand, the publisher has their own rating >> system that may involve numeric values that are understood by >> audiences in a certain way (more Pinocchios are worse, not better). >> If the rating value were inverted, but displayed to audiences in a >> snippet, then people would draw an incorrect conclusion about what >> the rating represented. In this case, the rating value is actually a >> text value, not a number value. >> >> Another point of confusion comes from the definitions of bestRating >> as the "highest value" implying it will be high number. Not all >> rating systems work that way. It would be better to keep the >> original values the publishers use, but clarify the scale by saying >> bestRating as "most favorable" rather than highest. Ultimately, I >> think there needs to be two separate rating values, a text value that >> is seen by audiences, and a numeric value that machine readable. >> >> >> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 1:04 AM, Tim Finin <finin@umbc.edu >> <mailto:finin@umbc.edu>> wrote: >> >> I just checked a few recent politifact items and they do indeed >> have the scale inverted. :-( >> >> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Aaron Bradley >> <aaranged@gmail.com <mailto:aaranged@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I haven't re-checked since I tweeted this on 11 April, but at >> that time PolitiFact seemed also was using a scale that was >> the inverse of the schema's specs: >> https://twitter.com/aaranged/status/851902710307737600 >> <https://twitter.com/aaranged/status/851902710307737600> >> >> > -- Charles McCathie Nevile - standards - Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2017 09:26:44 UTC