- From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 03:51:02 +0000
- To: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>, jsaiya@formatdata.com, public-schemaorg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAChbWaM_2uLKxL6z6y07_=zXPAMX05V8EMZBYdvsE=sdX+yqJg@mail.gmail.com>
We're good now. https://tools.wmflabs.org/reasonator/?q=Q29644050&lang=en On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 9:53 AM Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > I think your right Jim. Nutrition Information can come in many different > ways. Nutrition Facts Label is just one of those official structured ways. > > Thanks...let me think and work on gaps and subclasses on both sides to > accommodate that reasoning. > > On Mon, May 1, 2017, 3:25 PM Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> seeAlso: https://github.com/ouisharelabs/food-dashboard >> >> Note issue 6 >> >> On Mon., 1 May 2017, 4:58 pm Jim Saiya, <jsaiya@formatdata.com> wrote: >> >>> Hmm, http://schema.org/NutritionInformation would be used to mark up >>> information on a web page, which might be presented to look like a >>> Nutrition Facts label (some recipe sites do this), but would that make it >>> one? My feeling is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1531970 is meant to >>> indicate a label on a product package, as opposed to the collection of the >>> data itself. Maybe this would be enough difference so they are not >>> equivalent. >>> >>> Then again, http://data.lirmm.fr/ontologies/food#NutritionData has >>> already been linked as an equivalent class, and its definition, "Nutrition >>> data for a food item (recipe, product or ingredient)" *does* more closely >>> align with the schema.org definition. If it works for them...? >>> *Jim Saiya* >>> XML Analyst Developer >>> Detroit, MI >>> >>> ✆ *703.731.5119 <(703)%20731-5119>* >>> ✉ jsaiya@formatdata.com >>> [in] www.linkedin.com/in/jimsaiya >>> >>> *On Mon, 01 May 2017 03:01:17 +0000, Thad Guidry wrote:* >>> >>> Hi Gordon and Dan, >>> >>> I've begun updating Wikidata with new types and properties from 3.2 >>> release...so a question so far... >>> >>> Would we say that http://schema.org/NutritionInformation is equivalent >>> to a Nutritional Facts Label ? >>> >>> http://schema.org/NutritionInformation >>> equivalent to >>> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1531970 >>> >>> ??? >>> >>> Furthermore... it might be wise to also include this as a New Type to >>> avoid confusion. A Nutrition guide : any reference or document that >>> provides nutrition advice for general health >>> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q29639302 >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nutrition_guides >>> >>> Thoughts ? >>> -Thad >>> >>
Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2017 03:51:46 UTC