- From: Thomas Francart <thomas.francart@sparna.fr>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 12:34:00 +0200
- To: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
- Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPugn7VXqxyhmbGUHBBh-teEh1Qg0NDrXjcKLK=ujABOyTsxRA@mail.gmail.com>
Richard 2016-09-14 12:14 GMT+02:00 Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>: > As the documentation for temporalCoverage > <http://schema.org/temporalCoverage> states, it expects ISO 8601 > time interval format > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601#Time_intervals>, so the question > lies there. > > Your understanding I believe is correct, that the current version of the > standard ( *ISO 8601:2000* ) does not support open ended time intervals. > > In Dublin Core, which bases its formats on ISO 8601, open ended > intervals are supported > <http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/date-dccd-odrf/> but explicitly > state “This representation of an *open date range* is *not* compatible > with the representation of a time-interval defined by ISO8601:2000.” > > This has been the subject of a short https://github.com/project- > open-data/project-open-data.github.io/issues/415. > Many thanks for the pointers. > I support their conclusion that an open ended time period would be > currently best represented by the appropriate use [or non-use] of > schema:startDate and schema:endDate. > Indeed, but the problem is that schema:startDate and schema:endDate don't have CreativeWork in their Domain, while temporalCoverage does. Shouldn't startDate and endDate apply to CreativeWork too, if we want to be consistent ? Thomas > > ~Richard. > > > > Richard Wallis > Founder, Data Liberate > http://dataliberate.com > Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis > Twitter: @rjw > > On 14 September 2016 at 10:25, Thomas Francart <thomas.francart@sparna.fr> > wrote: > >> Hello >> >> Is it allowed to have values for temporalCoverage that have an open end ? >> i.e. only a start date, but no end date, or only an end date and no start >> date ? My understanding of the ISO 8601 format is that this is not allowed, >> but I would like to confirm. >> >> We need to be able to express a temporal coverage as an open interval in >> the description of Legislation (https://github.com/schemaorg/ >> schemaorg/issues/1156), and though we could reuse that property, but we >> can do it only if it allows open intervals (legislation currently >> applicable or in force would have a start date, but no end date). >> >> Thanks >> Thomas >> >> -- >> >> *Thomas Francart* -* SPARNA* >> Web de *données* | Architecture de l'*information* | Accès aux >> *connaissances* >> blog : blog.sparna.fr, site : sparna.fr, linkedin : >> fr.linkedin.com/in/thomasfrancart >> tel : +33 (0)6.71.11.25.97, skype : francartthomas >> > > -- *Thomas Francart* -* SPARNA* Web de *données* | Architecture de l'*information* | Accès aux *connaissances* blog : blog.sparna.fr, site : sparna.fr, linkedin : fr.linkedin.com/in/thomasfrancart tel : +33 (0)6.71.11.25.97, skype : francartthomas
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2016 10:34:50 UTC