- From: Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:42:57 -0700
- To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMbipBsBZDS7T+gnUTTPeU4g5pfUdQSSZzJ0q+fg5x9TKKB27Q@mail.gmail.com>
Sorry for the serial responses, but it's not back. Well, kind of. Missing on *https*://schema.org/CreativeWork. Present on *http*:// schema.org/CreativeWork. On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com> wrote: > Annnnd it's back. Weird. > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Nice catch Thad. Hoping this is a system bug, otherwise ... well, I >> can't even. Think it *is* a bug though, as http://schema.org/author >> still has CreativeWork listed under "Used on these types". >> >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> https://*pending*.schema.org/CreativeWork - *has author* >>> >>> https://schema.org/CreativeWork - *this does not have author* >>> >>> Did I miss something ? >>> >>> And what are we really trying to tell developers with the description >>> 'This is the same as the Author property for CreativeWork." ? That is can >>> be considered the same ? treated as the same ? >>> creator <https://schema.org/creator> Organization >>> <https://schema.org/Organization> or >>> Person <https://schema.org/Person> The creator/author of this >>> CreativeWork. This is the same as the Author property for CreativeWork. >>> >>> >>> Thad >>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> >>> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 1 September 2016 21:43:27 UTC