W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > September 2016

Re: Uhmm, what happened to author on CreativeWork ?

From: Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:42:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMbipBsBZDS7T+gnUTTPeU4g5pfUdQSSZzJ0q+fg5x9TKKB27Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
Sorry for the serial responses, but it's not back.  Well, kind of.  Missing
on *https*://schema.org/CreativeWork.  Present on *http*://
schema.org/CreativeWork.

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com> wrote:

> Annnnd it's back.  Weird.
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Nice catch Thad.  Hoping this is a system bug, otherwise ... well, I
>> can't even.  Think it *is* a bug though, as http://schema.org/author
>> still has CreativeWork listed under "Used on these types".
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> https://*pending*.schema.org/CreativeWork  - *has author*
>>>
>>> https://schema.org/CreativeWork - *this does not have author*
>>>
>>> Did I miss something ?
>>>
>>> And what are we really trying to tell developers with the description
>>> 'This is the same as the Author property for CreativeWork." ?  That is can
>>> be considered the same ? treated as the same ?
>>> creator <https://schema.org/creator> Organization
>>> <https://schema.org/Organization>  or
>>> Person <https://schema.org/Person>  The creator/author of this
>>> CreativeWork. This is the same as the Author property for CreativeWork.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thad
>>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 1 September 2016 21:43:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 1 September 2016 21:43:28 UTC