W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > September 2016

Re: Non-schema.org ontologies

From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 04:30:51 +0000
Message-ID: <CAM1Sok2virpGQ_DfT_OTTkvE3k-+fFBhm4kH=hwoN98VjhssBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Bennett <daniel@citizencontact.com>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 at 14:29 Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:

> You misunderstood me it appears.
> 'it just works' and 'Google provides a listing of Apps' means that you get
> prompted with Apps to download that can list public toilets on a map for
> you on your Android device.
> I didn't mean Google Maps in your browser has the Australia public toilet
> data populated.  I said that 'building cool integration inside the browser
> itself takes time' and its something you don't expect to pay Google or
> anyone for.
> Anyways, this thread is gitting a bit off track now, and delving into
> datasets, which there are millions, and which several hundreds and
> thousands of which the search engines and app providers have easy access to
> as we all do and utilize to provide you a richer experience.  You can give
> public feedback to Google Maps / Earth team about having the Australia
> public toilet dataset added as a KML layer if its not already done by
> someone since that seems to be your desire and usecase.
> Any more questions about Schema.org specifically I can help further answer
> ?

no.  tired of this interaction.

> Thad
> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
Received on Thursday, 1 September 2016 04:31:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:12:29 UTC