Re: rdfs:domain and refs:range in schema.org

ITT: Bunch of nerds

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 7:27 PM Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > On 26 Nov 2016, at 23:30, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > IMHO neither rdfs:domain nor schema:domainIncludes are ideal for
> schema.org. The whole notion of "global" property axioms is questionable.
> schema.org is class-centric and supposed to grow. To support its growth,
> properties should be attached locally to classes, in OO style.
> +1
>
> I think I argued in this direction 1 - 2 years ago on this mailing list.
> It will get very difficult to find catchy names for properties while
> avoiding conflicting definitions. The current pattern of prefixing
> potentially generic property names with a part from the class they are
> applicable to will not scale.
>
> Martin
>
>
>