- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 09:09:55 +0000
- To: Chad McEvoy <cmcevoy@globalgiving.org>
- Cc: public-schemaorg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2016 09:10:25 UTC
Is there any reason why each organisation can't be identified by an URL like https://bridge-registry.org/org/2874376344 In which case it is just a regular identifier and works with schema:sameAs of a schema:Organization. At some point you may choose to have a page per organisation anyway, and you could include schema.org annotations on that page. (Or serve alternate representations like application/ld+json) On 3 Mar 2016 08:17, "Chad McEvoy" <cmcevoy@globalgiving.org> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Thanks for adding me to your list. The BRIDGE project is an effort to > uniquely identify as many of the worlds social sector entities as possible > and has recently launched it's public look up tool. You can check it out > and learn more here: https://bridge-registry.org/ > > Integral to this database is the 10 digit BRIDGE Number which is a unique > identifier. There has been talk amongst the founding partners and funders > about adding this to schema.org. Please forgive my ignorance here--but > can anyone help me understand the process for doing that? And my apologies > if I am using the wrong terminology here. > > Regards, > > Chad >
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2016 09:10:25 UTC