- From: Thomas Francart <thomas.francart@sparna.fr>
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:03:55 +0100
- To: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>
- Cc: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPugn7WjaZNfqHW2LqsG1nQHnAo=iuD372Ww3L=d8aeBc3DLMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Jeff 2016-02-25 18:33 GMT+01:00 Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org>: > It seems like schema:contentUrl would be the best choice to point at the > actual URL of a media object that is being described: > http://schema.org/contentUrl. Here’s the description: > > > > Actual bytes of the media object, for example the image file or video file. > > > > You have to stare closely at the domain and range to see the difference > from schema:associatedMedia. They probably get mixed up in practice. > I intended to use contentUrl to refer to what would be the equivalent of a FRBR Item; I was thinking of keeping a schema:MediaObject to represent the Manifestation (linked to Expression with schema:associatedMedia as suggested by Richard), that would use contentUrl to point to actual physical file(s); the Manifestation is needed for various reasons : 1. specific metadata need to be expressed on the Manifestation : the signed PDF has a definitive "legalValue", while other formats are only informative; 2. there may be multiple physical files for a single Manifestation : a legislation may be splitted between a (short) body and (long) annexes (so there would be multiple contentUrl expressed on one Manifestation); 3. the same Manifestation may be published at different physical locations : typically a Parliament website and the Official Journal publishers (so again multiple contentUrl, but pointing to different websites); How does that sound ? Thomas > > > Jeff > > > > *From:* Richard Wallis [mailto:richard.wallis@dataliberate.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, February 25, 2016 12:07 PM > *To:* Thomas Francart <thomas.francart@sparna.fr> > *Cc:* schema.org Mailing List <public-schemaorg@w3.org> > *Subject:* Re: FRBR and schema.org > > > > > > On 25 February 2016 at 13:32, Thomas Francart <thomas.francart@sparna.fr> > wrote: > > > > > > What about using schema:MediaObject+schema:associatedMedia to describe > PDF/HTML/XML Manifestations ? > > > > I would > > > > As MediaObject is a subtype of CreativeWork you have the properties you > need to use either associtedMedia or workExampleto relate to the > manifestation description. > > > > ~Richard > -- *Thomas Francart* -* SPARNA* Web de *données* | Architecture de l'*information* | Accès aux *connaissances* blog : blog.sparna.fr, site : sparna.fr, linkedin : fr.linkedin.com/in/thomasfrancart tel : +33 (0)6.71.11.25.97, skype : francartthomas
Received on Friday, 26 February 2016 08:04:48 UTC