- From: Tati Chevron <tati@gotati.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 23:04:45 +0000
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Cc: Robert Kost <rkost@thematix.com>, "public-schemaorg@w3.org" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 06:44:04PM +0000, Dan Brickley wrote: >The whole point is to make things easier and CC-BY was chosen on the >thinking that URLs suffice. > >I doubt there is much value to be gained from doing a line-by-line >reading of the CC-BY license here on the project list. However if >community members do want to continue this discussion in detail I'd >suggest taking it to the issue tracker in Github - Sorry if my original post was off-topic, I've really got no desire to start an analysis of the CC license here or anywhere else. It just seemed a shame to continue ignoring something potentially interesting from a technical viewpoint such as Schema, just because of an unclear licensing situation. -- Tati Chevron. http://www.gotati.com/
Received on Friday, 12 February 2016 23:08:22 UTC