W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > February 2016

Re: Schema usage and licensing

From: Tati Chevron <tati@gotati.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 23:04:45 +0000
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Cc: Robert Kost <rkost@thematix.com>, "public-schemaorg@w3.org" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20160212230445.GB29099@mercury.lan>
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 06:44:04PM +0000, Dan Brickley wrote:
>The whole point is to make things easier and CC-BY was chosen on the
>thinking that URLs suffice.
>I doubt there is much value to be gained from doing a line-by-line
>reading of the CC-BY license here on the project list. However if
>community members do want to continue this discussion in detail I'd
>suggest taking it to the issue tracker in Github -

Sorry if my original post was off-topic, I've really got no desire to start an analysis of the CC license here or anywhere else.  

It just seemed a shame to continue ignoring something potentially interesting from a technical viewpoint such as Schema, just because of an unclear licensing situation.

Tati Chevron.
Received on Friday, 12 February 2016 23:08:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:12:23 UTC