- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 20:32:34 +0100
- To: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
- Cc: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>, Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com>, Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
On 16 September 2015 at 20:30, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: >> >> I see https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/249 was closed in >> favour of #323, but are there any conclusions to draw about >> contentLocation - can we clarify its meaning? > > > In 2.0, we updated the description to read "The location depicted or > described in the content. For example, the location in a photograph or > painting." Do you think that is sufficient. Right you are! Looks great :) > I can get around to this Friday. San Giorgio Maggiore at Dusk is my favorite > example as it resides in the National Museum Cardiff, but is a painting of > an island of Venice. Sounds good Dan > - Vicki > > Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com >
Received on Wednesday, 16 September 2015 19:33:02 UTC