- From: Stuart Robinson <stuartro@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 09:43:54 -0700
- To: public-schemaorg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAHE-x9EwyW_fcm_HjjGKrAeeYdPJQnWdy_sqs1EdJ=Ckykc9FQ@mail.gmail.com>
I've noticed that schema.org doesn't provide vocabulary for legal decisions--e.g., the Supreme Court case Citizens United vs Federal Election Commission: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=000&invol=08-205 One challenge for modeling this domain is coming up with a model that accommodates different types of courts, both within and between countries. It may be easier to develop a model for US legal decisions first and then expand it later or create other types for non-US courts. With that in mind, I would propose the type USLegalDecision with the following properties: name: the name of the decision (for Supreme Court cases, usually something like "X v Y") court: the court where the decision was made (e.g., Supreme Court) country:the country where the decision applies whenArgued: the date on which arguments whenDecided: the date on which the decision was rendered citation: the case citation for the decision courtAppealedFrom: which court the case was appealed from (optional since some cases low-level courts aren't appealed from another court) [note: optional given that a decision in a lower court won't be appealed from another court] Using the Citizens United example, here's what the values might look like: name: "Citizens United versus FEC" court: "Supreme Court" country: "USA" whenArgued: [ "March 24, 2009", "September 9, 2009" ] whenDecided: "January 21, 2010" citation: "Citizens United v. Federal Election Comm'n, (558 U.S. ___ (2010); Docket No. 08-205)" courtAppealedFrom: "United States District Court for the District of Columbia" There are some additional properties to consider, such as the following: Judge(s) OpinionAuthor ConcurrenceAuthor DissentAuthor LegalHolding(s) Thoughts on the general modeling issues here (e.g., US-specificity) and feedback on the specific proposal would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Stuart Robinson
Received on Friday, 22 May 2015 12:43:52 UTC