- From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:14:09 +0200
- To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Cc: Alex M <tech.guy415@gmail.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADjV5jf7Ly-=XnJWZz3dYY8NMjBNXovBNkfzioLXb2be0xLOBg@mail.gmail.com>
How about native JSON-LD lists (i.e. RDF collections) over ItemList whenever possible? That'd turn the above example into: { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "TravelAction", "fromLocation": "USA", "toLocation": "Costa Rica", "name": "Travel from USA to Costa Rica", "instrument": { "@list": [ {"name": "A Valid Passport"}, {"name": "Pre-paid airline or bus ticket to exit Costa Rica"}, {"name": "$100.00US dollars per every 30 calendar days you plan to stay in Costa Rica"} ] }, "distance": "2000 miles" } (For properties where the value is always expected to be a @list (and not a @set), the term can be defined in the @context, like: "instrument": {"@container": "@list"}, to omit the wrapping {"@list": [...]} construct.) (Also, in RDFa 1.1, the @inlist attribute is available for the same purpose.) Cheers, Niklas On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > Yikes! > > DanBri - Can we make this easier in the future somehow for folks ? > > Thad > +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Alex M <tech.guy415@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I wish plural would be easier ... well, it may not be what you expect, >> but this validates: >> >> <script type="application/ld+json"> >> { >> "@context":"http://schema.org", >> "@type":"TravelAction", >> "fromLocation": "USA", >> "toLocation": "Costa Rica", >> "name": "Travel from USA to Costa Rica", >> "instrument": { >> "@type": "ItemList", >> "numberOfItems": 3, >> "itemListElement": [ >> { >> "@type": "ListItem", >> "position": 1, >> "item": { >> "name": "A Valid Passport" >> } >> }, >> { >> "@type": "ListItem", >> "position": 2, >> "item": { >> "name": "Pre-paid airline or bus ticket to exit Costa Rica" >> } >> }, >> { >> "@type": "ListItem", >> "position": 3, >> "item": { >> "name": "$100.00US dollars per every 30 calendar days you plan >> to stay in Costa Rica" >> } >> } >> ]}, >> "distance":"2000 miles" >> } >> } >> </script> >> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> oh boy... ok...your thinking much later... >>> Let's start simple and work outwards and upwards from there.... >>> >>> <script type="application/ld+json"> >>> { >>> "@context":"http://schema.org", >>> "@type":"TravelAction", >>> "fromLocation": "USA", >>> "toLocation": "Costa Rica", >>> "name": "Travel from USA to Costa Rica", >>> "instrument": {"name": "A Valid Passport"}, >>> "distance":"2000 miles" >>> } >>> </script> >>> >>> >>> Thad >>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Alex M <tech.guy415@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Here is my first attempt to do it on a JSON TD style, but very simple >>>> and basic. I am getting three errors and perhaps it is that I do not quite >>>> understand how to extend one schema to the other. Any help is welcome. I >>>> get three errors. >>>> >>>> <script type="application/ld+json"> >>>> { >>>> "@context":"http://schema.org", >>>> "@type":"TravelAction", >>>> "fromLocation": "USA", >>>> "toLocation": "Costa Rica", >>>> >>>> #ERROR //Thing is not a known valid target type for the name property. >>>> You can see here that THING has NAME http://schema.org/Thing >>>> >>>> "name": { >>>> "@type":"Thing", >>>> #ERROR//The property about is not recognized by Google for an object of >>>> type Thing. >>>> YOu can see here that THING has ABOUT http://schema.org/Thing >>>> "about":"Costa Rica Required Entry and Transit Documents" >>>> }, >>>> #ERROR //The property itemListElement is not recognized by Google >>>> for an object of type TravelAction. >>>> This should be from THING so it is probably my syntax. >>>> >>>> "itemListElement": >>>> [ >>>> { >>>> "@type": "ListItem", >>>> "position": 1, >>>> "item": >>>> { >>>> "name": "A Valid Passport" >>>> }, >>>> "@type": "ListItem", >>>> "position": 2, >>>> "item": >>>> { >>>> "name": "Pre-paid airline or bus ticket to exit Costa Rica" >>>> }, >>>> "@type": "ListItem", >>>> "position": 3, >>>> "item": >>>> { >>>> "name": "$100.00US dollars per every 30 calendar days you plan to >>>> stay in Costa Rica" >>>> } >>>> } >>>> ] >>>> } >>>> >>>> </script> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ooops typo ! this is better : >>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#embedding-json-ld-in-html-documents >>>>> >>>>> Thad >>>>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The answer is easy ! Just spend 3 hours reading the full official >>>>>> documentation thus far ! >>>>>> >>>>>> Or skip directly to the answers your looking for provided by me: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#interpreting-json-as-json-ld >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#embedding-json-ld-in-htmls-documents >>>>>> >>>>>> As well as visiting the awesomeness that is: >>>>>> http://json-ld.org/learn.html >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thad >>>>>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Alex M <tech.guy415@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Is the script placed inside the <head> tag or before the </body>? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> JSON_LD is a preference (whenever you can accomplish that.) :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thad >>>>>>>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Alex M <tech.guy415@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is it better to do this on the HTML mark up or on JSON-LD? Does >>>>>>>>> it fulfill the same purpose or for search engines is better the HTML markup? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Received on Friday, 14 August 2015 09:15:08 UTC