- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:01:13 +0100
- To: "mfhepp@gmail.com" <mfhepp@gmail.com>
- Cc: Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
On 22 April 2015 at 12:56, mfhepp@gmail.com <mfhepp@gmail.com> wrote: > Would changing to HTTPS create specific problems when we use the new hostname-based extension mechanism? I am really not an HTTPS expert, but I assume that the certificate would then have to cover the hostname-based URIs for reviewed extensions. That is one of the complications I would rather investigate before loudly encouraging the https version to be treated as primary. Dan
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2015 12:01:41 UTC