Re: The role of Role in Schema.org

I see now, the presence of blank nodes in the graph is assumed in the
example's description. This makes much more sense. Thank you.

_____________________________________________________
Jacob Jett
Research Assistant
Center for Informatics Research in Science and Scholarship
The Graduate School of Library and Information Science
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
501 E. Daniel Street, MC-493, Champaign, IL 61820-6211 USA
(217) 244-2164
jjett2@illinois.edu

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
wrote:

>  Hi Jacob,
>
>  I’m not seeing the triples you are.  A conversion of the Turtle in that
> last example gives this:
>
>   *<http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q943241
> <http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q943241>>* <
> http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <
> http://schema.org/PerformingGroup> .
>  *<http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q943241
> <http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q943241>>* <http://schema.org/name>
> "Gentle Giant" .
>  *<http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q943241
> <http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q943241>>* <http://schema.org/employee>
> *_:ub33bL4C21* .
>  *_:ub33bL4C21 *<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <
> http://schema.org/Role> .
>  *_:ub33bL4C21 *<http://schema.org/roleName> "Keyboards Roadie" .
>  *_:ub33bL4C21 *<http://schema.org/startDate> "1975" .
>  *_:ub33bL4C21 *<http://schema.org/endDate> "1976" .
>  *_:ub33bL4C21 *<http://schema.org/employee> *_:ub33bL9C25* .
>  *_:ub33bL9C25 *<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <
> http://schema.org/Person> .
>  *_:ub33bL9C25 *<http://schema.org/name> "Richard Wallis" .
>
>
>  ~Richard
>
>  On 15 Apr 2015, at 20:22, Jacob Jett <jjett2@illinois.edu> wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>
>  I'm new here. I'm PhD student at the University of Illinois and I work
> on a variety of linked data and RDF technology projects, among them the Web
> Annotation Working Group. We're looking at employing schema for a number of
> things, so I'm trying to get a better sense of it.
>
>  I'm still getting up to speed with the outstanding issues this CG is
> discussing but one thing that leaps out of me from the blog post's final
> example is the triple:
>
>  schema:employee schema:employee [list]
>
>  Is the schema:employee predicate itself intended to be within possible
> set of subjects for triples employing it? It seems as though this is
> technically possible according to the rdf and rdfs specs but is this
> desirable? Was there a use case that drove this decision? Can I have an
> infinite recursion of schema:employee schema:employee schema:employee?
>
>  Regards,
>
>  Jacob
>
>
>  _____________________________________________________
> Jacob Jett
> Research Assistant
> Center for Informatics Research in Science and Scholarship
> The Graduate School of Library and Information Science
> University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
> 501 E. Daniel Street, MC-493, Champaign, IL 61820-6211 USA
> (217) 244-2164
> jjett2@illinois.edu
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
> wrote:
>
>> The role of Role in Schema.org <http://schema.org/>
>>
>> An explanation of this very useful feature that turned into a blog post.
>> http://dataliberate.com/2015/04/the-role-of-role-in-schema-org/
>>
>>  An obvious candidate for the documentation being discussed here
>> recently.  More than happy to copy it in once we have decided what we are
>> doing.
>>
>>  ~Richard
>>
>>
>
>