- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:29:57 +0100
- To: Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>, Owen Stephens <owen@ostephens.com>, "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
On 27 April 2015 at 16:24, Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh, and: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I do find it a bit funny that the first reaction to a proposed extension >> is that it seems that some of the types and properties should be part of the >> core (well yeah! this is important stuff, and of course it intersects with >> other domains like VisualArtwork), and is getting reviewed as though it was >> going to be part of core. > > > On that note, I had thought about adding VisualArtwork to the domain of the > artist, colorist, inker, letterer, and penciler properties, but didn't > because we were off in our own extension and I didn't want to entangle Paul > Watson and VisualArtwork in the discussion of something that currently is > just wanted for the description of Comics. However, if that does come up, > sure, I think it makes sense to add in VisualArtwork as a domain. Could you file an issue to capture that point? Am also finding the extensions-vs-core situation interesting and/or funny. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intertwingularity ? Dan
Received on Monday, 27 April 2015 15:30:26 UTC