Re: bib.schema.org 1.0 proposal

Oh, and:

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com> wrote:

> I do find it a bit funny that the first reaction to a proposed extension
> is that it seems that some of the types and properties should be part of
> the core (well yeah! this is important stuff, and of course it intersects
> with other domains like VisualArtwork), and is getting reviewed as though
> it was going to be part of core.
>

On that note, I had thought about adding VisualArtwork to the domain of the
artist, colorist, inker, letterer, and penciler properties, but didn't
because we were off in our own extension and I didn't want to entangle Paul
Watson and VisualArtwork in the discussion of something that currently is
just wanted for the description of Comics. However, if that does come up,
sure, I think it makes sense to add in VisualArtwork as a domain.

Received on Monday, 27 April 2015 15:25:16 UTC