RDA and schema.org (was: An initial proposal for bib.schema.org)

Hi Tim:

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Tim Knight/osgoode <
TKnight@osgoode.yorku.ca> wrote:

> Has anyone considered incorporating the work done by the RDA Registry
> group into this proposal? <http://www.rdaregistry.info/Elements/>
>

Many of us are certainly aware of RDA. While schema.org and RDA arguably
have different philosophies about intended usage scenarios and ease of use,
and we almost certainly don't want to try to just shoehorn all of RDA (e.g.
more than 700 unconstrained properties) into schema.org, there may be cases
where it makes sense to reuse some of the work that RDA has done for
external enumerations, for example.

Do you have specific ideas for where you think it would be appropriate to
borrow or adopt from RDA?

Dan