Re: An initial proposal for bib.schema.org

Hi Thad,

1. Are some of those Types on the 1st pass or have been iterated over now ?  I haven't been following you ugys much, been away for a bit...


This is the first time these particular proposals have been put in front of this group.  However the first grouping have been previously been seen as part of BibliGraph.net<http://BibliGraph.net>  and some of them, especially the translation ones, are being used in environments such as viaf.org<http://viaf.org>.  The comic proposals have previously been discussed on public-vocabs list.

2. How will extension versions be handled for bib groups that might care about version support in their tools and ILM's ?  Did we finalize that with Dan in previous discussions ?  I forgot already from February !

This is probably a question best posed in the Schemaorg Group<https://www.w3.org/community/schemaorg/> as it is relevant to all extensions.


Thad
+ThadGuidry<https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>

Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2015 22:46:43 UTC