- From: Owen Stephens <owen@ostephens.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 21:25:41 +0000
- To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Cc: Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com>, "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
On 21 Nov 2013, at 20:51, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote: > On 11/21/13 12:12 PM, Owen Stephens wrote: > >> I'd argue that the issue is a creative work - especially if we are >> talking about issues of less "academic" periodicals - for example the >> January issue of Wired is surely a creative work in it's own right? > > Owen, I wasn't aware that the proposal said otherwise, but perhaps I haven't fully understood the implications. I was responding to Dan's comment "it seems like a stretch to call the issue CreativeWork." in his mail - which was in response to me questioning the using of Intangible rather than CreativeWork for Issuance > To make things practical, it seems that the journal/periodical, the issue, and all of the articles must be creative works - in part because, well, what else could they be? There are also individual issues that have a coherent theme and that are essentially anthologies issued by a periodical publisher. (Note, and here we get into the territory currently occupied by the folks working on Comics in schema.org [1]. They already have a proposed PeriodicalSeries and PeriodicalIssue, and it's structured quite differently from what we have been discussing.) I agree. (and I need to re-read the Comics proposals) Owen
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2013 21:26:12 UTC