Re: Candidates for the CreativeWork property names vote off

Ouch. The possibility of this interpretation is unacceptable to me:

A -> oneOf -> B
B -> oneOf -> A

I can't tell up from down anymore. It might even get confused for sideways. If that's what will happen, then I would withdraw "oneOf" from this list and suggest a different proposal for "seeAlso".

BTW, that seems like an oddly good idea. Now if I could just remember where I've seen it before. ;-)

Jeff

Sent from my iPad

On Mar 27, 2013, at 4:56 PM, "Karen Coyle" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote:

> I do think oneOf should be on the list. Also, I'm not fond of the
> "has..." form of property names. I prefer something that sounds more
> like a relationship than "has a thing" - So I"d add:
> 
> 8. instantiates
> 9. realizes
> 
> I think that the inverse relationships imply that the relationship be
> directional, whereas without the inverse the relationship is more open.
> In fact,
> 
> A -> oneOf -> B
> B -> oneOf -> A
> 
> makes perfect sense to me.
> 
> Not all of the terms (hasInstance, hasConcretization) can be used in
> this way, which is why I don't suggest a non-inverse form for each of
> them. However, we are back to the difference between Work/Instance and
> "commonEndeavor" (for which Jeff's 'oneOf' would be an interesting
> substitute).
> 
> kc
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/27/13 1:04 PM, Young,Jeff (OR) wrote:
> > At the risk of distracting people from my favorite, I would re-offer:
> >
> > oneOf
> >
> > without an inverse property. There are plenty of properties in
> > Schema.org that don't have an inverse, so this shouldn't be unusual to
> > them.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Wallis,Richard [mailto:Richard.Wallis@oclc.org]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 3:58 PM
> >> To: public-schemabibex@w3.org
> >> Subject: Candidates for the CreativeWork property names vote off
> >>
> >> Following Antoine's suggestion and little consensus as to the names
> > for
> >> the CreativeWork properties currently documented as hasInstance &
> >> isInstanceOf - I am preparing to have a vote on it.
> >>
> >> So this is the first part of the process - assembling the candidates.
> >>
> >> Here is a few of what I remember having seen and heard in threads and
> >> discussions - please add others I have missed or that you think of
> > over
> >> the next few days.  I will close the candidate list on 31st March.
> >>
> >>
> >>    1.  hasInstance/instanceOf
> >>    2.  hasConcretization/concretizationOf
> >>    3.  hasRealization/relaisationOf
> >>    4.  hasExpression/expressionOf
> >>    5.  hasExample/exampleOf
> >>    6.  hasDerivative/derivativeOf
> >>
> >> ~Richard
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Karen Coyle
> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
> ph: 1-510-540-7596
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet
> 
>