- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:32:58 +0200
- To: <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
Hi Karen, > I'm listening to the meeting recording (it's amazing how much more it makes sense the second time around!). Antoine made a good proposal about asking the general vocab list about the possibility of modifying definitions of properties like "offer". Right now, this is the definition for offer: > > "An offer to sell an item—for example, an offer to sell a product, the DVD of a movie, or tickets to an event." > > I think we could describe our case for using offer and ask about the community's feeling about making the definition a bit more general. > Yes, but as said in the call I'd insist on not describing the case entirely (i.e, with 150 different attributes, FRBR chains, what have you not...). Just making the point for motivating that there are 'free offers' that we'd like to represent using the schema.org/Offer class. Otherwise the WebSchema guys won't even care reading the email (and rightfully so). Cheers, Antoine
Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2013 22:33:28 UTC