RE: A request to use schema.org markup

I wish Microdata would die so we could focus on the model.

Jeff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Ronallo [mailto:jronallo@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 7:16 PM
> To: Karen Coyle
> Cc: public-schemabibex@w3.org
> Subject: Re: A request to use schema.org markup
> 
> Karen,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
wrote:
> >> - On the turtle-ish section: I'd be glad to help, but as I don't
> know
> >> which is "that" page...
> >> I'd assume however you can just load the mark-up into a distiller
> and
> >> copy-paste the result, as already done in
> >> http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/CommonEndeavor
> >
> >
> > I removed the "turtle-ish" section -- it wasn't appropriate to the
> example.
> > But do tell me about this distiller... from what to what? Is there
> one
> > that is mainly used?
> 
> There are a bunch of tools that will do this kind of
> conversion/distilling from Microdata to RDF or from RDFa to RDF.
> 
> I used this for the CommonEndeavor N3 example. Gregg Kellogg seems to
> keep up with these kinds of conversion issues. That he writes these
> tools in Ruby :-).
> http://rdf.greggkellogg.net/distiller
> 
> The other one I've seen recently mentioned is the RDF Translator.
> http://rdf-translator.appspot.com/
> 
> Running the CommonEndeavor example through both gives different output
> in N3 notation. I can't say what that means though.
> 
> The other tools I like for looking at Microdata snippets to understand
> the data are:
> http://foolip.org/microdatajs/live/
> http://linter.structured-data.org/ (also by Gregg Kellogg)
> 
> Each of the search engines also have tools available, but they do not
> have as nice a visual layout as I'd like.
> 
> What other tools do folks like or recommend for distilling RDF out of
> Microdata + schema.org?
> 
> Jason
>

Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 00:31:57 UTC