- From: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:42:00 +0000
- To: Jason Ronallo <jronallo@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-schemabibex@w3.org
Thanks for these Jason! It's particularly interesting to note the invalid terms being used -- these indicate either problems in understanding (e.g. surely there's some other price property that could be pulled) or actual needs. http://schema.org/Book/price* 46 http://schema.org/Book/numPages* 45 http://schema.org/Book/publishDate* 17 http://schema.org/Book/priceCurrency* 11 http://schema.org/Book/ratingValue* 10 -Jodi On 25 Jan 2013, at 03:50, Jason Ronallo wrote: > Hi, > > As this group progresses, I thought it might be useful to begin to > look at how schema.org is already being used for marking up > bibliographic content. Having more data might help make better > proposals. > > So I took a quick look at some of the data that already exists and > wrote it up here: > http://jronallo.github.com/blog/the-prevalence-of-schema-dot-org-book-properties-in-the-wild/ > > What other questions do folks have that existing data like this might > help answer? I'm hoping to take a closer look at the Web Data Commons > corpus eventually. > > Jason >
Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 11:42:35 UTC