Re: audiobook options in objects

We must trust what they tell us:

http://schema.org/docs/extension.html


As I read this, URI tokens that are subordinate to class URIs are interpreted as subclasses and tokens subordinate to property URIs are interpreted as sub properties. There is no indication that mix ups otherwise are treated sensibly

Jeff. 

Sent from my iPad

On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:58 PM, "Karen Coyle" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote:

> Great, owen. I'll work on proposal 2 since that seems to be the mostly likely one in my set. I'm not clear about repetition of property names in schema.org -- is it legit to have two schemas that both have a property "isbn"? I believe this was discussed either here or on the public-vocab list, and I was left with the impression that the URI pattern is
> 
> http://schema.org/[property]
> 
> and not
> 
> http://schema.org/Book/[property]
> http://schema.org/Audiobook/[property]
> 
> Can anyone confirm? Because that would knock out a couple of the options that are currently on the page.
> 
> kc
> 
> On 2/8/13 3:46 PM, Owen Stephens wrote:
>> OK - I've given markup a go for Proposal 5 - not done this before so likely be errors/misconceptions on my part so anyone should feel free to chip in and improve.
>> http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Object_Types#Proposal_5

>> Owen
>> 
>> Owen Stephens
>> Owen Stephens Consulting
>> Web: http://www.ostephens.com

>> Email: owen@ostephens.com
>> Telephone: 0121 288 6936
>> 
>> On 8 Feb 2013, at 18:01, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@KCOYLE.NET> wrote:
>> 
>>> So many choices! :-) Should the next step be to try to encode a few items and see how it works?
>>> 
>>> Also, the creativeWork "encoding" is *supposed* to be of type MediaObject. Does that make a difference?
>>> 
>>> kc
>>> 
>>> On 2/8/13 7:46 AM, Owen Stephens wrote:
>>>> Hi Karen,
>>>> 
>>>> I'm inclined to ignore that definition of Media Object :) There is no reason why an Audio-book shouldn't be embedded in a webpage so I wouldn't want to exclude this either)
>>>> 
>>>> I think you could make use of the Creative Work property "encoding" rather than making it a type of Media Object - which allows some split of content and carrier? (not wishing to resurrect that discussion!)
>>>> 
>>>> This would allow:
>>>> 
>>>> Proposal
>>>> Thing > CreativeWork > Audiobook
>>>> Thing > CreativeWork > Book > Audiobook
>>>> 
>>>> New properties for audiobook type
>>>> 
>>>>    • readBy -- expected type: Person
>>>> 
>>>> Properties likely to be used from Book
>>>> 
>>>>    • bookEdition (for abridgement note)
>>>>    • isbn
>>>> 
>>>> With a separate Media Object to be created and referenced using 'encoding' property from CreativeWork?
>>>> 
>>>> I've added as Proposal 4
>>>> 
>>>> Owen
>>>> 
>>>> Owen Stephens
>>>> Owen Stephens Consulting
>>>> Web: http://www.ostephens.com

>>>> Email: owen@ostephens.com
>>>> Telephone: 0121 288 6936
>>>> 
>>>> On 8 Feb 2013, at 15:23, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I wrote up three options for audiobook:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Object_Types#AudioBook

>>>>> 
>>>>> A key question here is whether we can re-use MediaObject, since it is defined as being media embedded in a web page.
>>>>> 
>>>>> kc
>>>>> --
>>>>> Karen Coyle
>>>>> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net

>>>>> ph: 1-510-540-7596
>>>>> m: 1-510-435-8234
>>>>> skype: kcoylenet
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Karen Coyle
>>> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net

>>> ph: 1-510-540-7596
>>> m: 1-510-435-8234
>>> skype: kcoylenet
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Karen Coyle
> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net

> ph: 1-510-540-7596
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet
> 
>