- From: Laura Dawson <ljndawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:45:21 -0500
- To: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@oclc.org>
- Cc: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
*cheers loudly* At ISNI we are looking at ways to make the identifiers resolvable - so that an ISNI could in fact be an actionable URI. The only thing stopping us is a "terms and conditions" click-through that we are about to eliminate. So a Person URI could be a direct link to their page in the ISNI database. (Or - to complicate matters - it could MULTIPLY resolve to both ISNI and VIAF...and Wikipedia...and other places, if the identifier is embedded in a DOI.) On Nov 27, 2012, at 12:36 PM, Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@oclc.org> wrote: > Karen, > > I think you are conflating the marking up of 'text on a web page' with > describing the 'thing' the page is about. > > On the page describing a CreativeWork with a name property of "War and > Peace" you may [dependant on locale] show the user a string of characters > representing the author thus: "Leo Tolstoy" or thus: "Лев Никола́евич > Толсто́й". In schema.org you should supply [as the author property] a URI > to a page that represents (and describes). That Person description then may > have more than one name properties (in this example at least two: "Leo > Tolstoy" and "Лев Никола́евич Толсто́й"). > > Such Person URIs could be direct links to places such as VIAF > <http://viaf.org/viaf/96987389>. Alternatively they could be URIs in a > local implementation which then asserts sameAs relationships with things > like VIAF resources. > > Does this mean that I am suggesting that sources like VIAF should be adding > Schema markup to their services? - Yes I am. > > > > On 27/11/2012 15:58, "Karen Coyle" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote: > >> This already means that libraries >> in Russia will have author Лев Никола́евич Толсто́й, and in the >> English-speaking world we will have author Leo Tolstoy (or some variant >> on that). These are the same real person, but I don't think that's the >> point -- the point is that schema.org allows you to mark up your data, > > >
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2012 16:45:50 UTC