- From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@oclc.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:29:05 -0500
- To: "Pilsk, Suzanne" <PilskS@si.edu>, "Dawson, Laura" <Laura.Dawson@bowker.com>, "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
Assuming that you define a ghost as a Person, yes. Presuming that we lobbied successfully to add a Boolean 'isFictional' property to the Schema.org Thing class any other class that inherits from Thing could use it. Check out the description of the Person class <http://schema.org/Person> 'A person (alive, dead, undead, or fictional).' and you will see the five properties inherited from Thing listed at the top. ~Richard. On 08/11/2012 16:17, "Pilsk, Suzanne" <PilskS@si.edu> wrote: > This is the discussion that goes on in the library cataloging standards group > - that crops up when a new batch of catalogers are trained and are surprised > by the "rules". > > > Casper the friendly ghost - fictional to some, a real ghost to others. > Lassie - the dog - a real dog - actually played by multiple canines. > > I like the idea of a person is a person who is fictional vs taking a "fake > personality" and making it a "thing". > > We have a linked data project in the works with FAKE Botanists. > > So Richard, are you saying it would be person (is fictional) - under "Thing"? > > Suzanne > > > Suzanne C. Pilsk > Head, Metadata Unit > Smithsonian Institution Libraries > Connecting. Ideas. Information. You. > 10th & Constitution Avenues, NW, NH2207 > MRC 154, P.O. Box 37012 > Washington, DC 20013-7012 > v. 202.633.1646 > PilskS@si.edu > Please consider the environment before printing this email. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Wallis [mailto:richard.wallis@oclc.org] > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 4:15 PM > To: Dawson, Laura; public-schemabibex@w3.org > Subject: Re: Itemprop for person > > In the Schema.org world the 'Thing' class is what every other class inherits > properties from, so a Person, an Organization, a Book, a Product, are all > Things. > > ~Richard. > > > On 08/11/2012 16:12, "Dawson, Laura" <Laura.Dawson@bowker.com> wrote: > >> Is a fictional character a person or a thing? >> >> Oooh, philosophy! "What is the nature of a thing?" >> >> Laura Dawson >> Product Manager, Identifiers >> Bowker >> laura.dawson@bowker.com >> ________________________________________ >> From: Richard Wallis [richard.wallis@oclc.org] >> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 4:07 PM >> To: Dawson, Laura; public-schemabibex@w3.org >> Subject: Re: Itemprop for person >> >> The more I think about it, the more inclined I am to suggest that this >> is a suggested new property for 'Thing' - most any type of thing you >> describe could be fictional. >> >> ~Richard >> >> >> On 08/11/2012 15:55, "Dawson, Laura" <Laura.Dawson@bowker.com> wrote: >> >>> I like this very much! >>> >>> Laura Dawson >>> Product Manager, Identifiers >>> Bowker >>> laura.dawson@bowker.com >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: Richard Wallis [richard.wallis@oclc.org] >>> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 3:48 PM >>> To: Dawson, Laura; public-schemabibex@w3.org >>> Subject: Re: Itemprop for person >>> >>> Interesting thought also applicable for Organization (such as >>> Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry) >>> >>> ~Richard. >>> >>> On 08/11/2012 15:35, "Dawson, Laura" <Laura.Dawson@bowker.com> wrote: >>> >>> Could we possibly add an ³isfictional² tag? To identify characters >>> (such as Sherlock Holmes)? Some fictional characters will eventually >>> have ISNIs and we¹ll need to structure data around them. >>> >>> Laura Dawson >>> Product Manager, Identifiers >>> Bowker >>> Land: (908) 219-0082 >>> Cell: (917) 770-6641 >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2012 21:30:17 UTC