Re: Missing Schema.Org properties

On 12/3/12 7:19 AM, Richard Wallis wrote:
>
> Hi Shlomo,
>
> Couple of points.

> *Identifiers: *This is a particular concern of mine.

Me, too!

  The approach of
> having a named property for each possible identifier that a CreativeWork
> or a Person could have, just does not scale.  However to handle this you
> will always be disenfranchising some identifier backing group.  Isbn
> seems to of got in because it is know by everyone, oclcnum is obvious
> from where I sit (but that does not make it right).   I think we (in all
> of Schema, not just the bib domain) need an identifier Type with
> properties of ‘identifierValue’ and ‘identifierType’ - which could
> handle either an enumerated list or at least well known identifier names.

I believe that this means that "Identifier" becomes a "schema" in 
schema.org.

kc

>
> ~Richard.
>
> On 03/12/2012 02:48, "Shlomo Sanders" <Shlomo.Sanders@exlibrisgroup.com>
> wrote:
>
>     Missing objects and properties:
>     · Ability to describe authoritative subjects (LC/Mesh/etc.)?
>     Is this Genre? I don’t think this is Keyword.
>
>     · Issn, issue, volume, eissn, etc. (Book has isbn but article does
>     not have issn).
>     Should there be Journal and article have ability to state membership
>     in a Journal (either through properties and/or URI of the Journal)?
>
>     · Other identifiers: Eisbn, Doi (same as above), pmid, oclc number,
>     Ex Libris too has IDs, etc,
>
>     · Citations
>
>     · (Digital) Access Rights, Embargo
>
>     · Collections and Packages
>
>     · Abstract, ToC
>
>     · Additional Title?
>
>     · Thumbnail
>
>     · Author Initial
>
>
>     If someone thinks there are ways of describing the above then please
>     say so.
>     The above list added to the Wiki.
>
>     Shlomo
>
>
>

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet

Received on Monday, 3 December 2012 16:06:17 UTC