- From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 12:00:34 +0100
- To: public-schema-course-extend@w3.org
- Cc: Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk>
- Message-ID: <CAD47Kz6Zh34TRYEPOigq0f_D5d9S_Mny1A1AA=bx3wefuG7BRA@mail.gmail.com>
Reacting to other threads in this area can I offer a little pragmatic advice. Much of the successful work in expanding and extending Schema and its extensions has been based upon taking core principles, types, properties, usage etc. for an area, then iteratively building upon them as and when required, needed, or understood. The later work building on the practical usage, and modelling popularity, of what has been laid down previously. My feeling is that we are already delving far too deep in some areas - course structure for example - to have any confidence in how, or indeed if, what we are discussing will be generally used in the future. Remembering the prime purpose of Schema markup is to share information in a generic way to help potential students, in this case, discover courses that might meet their requirements, and be directed to their full descriptions on provider’s sites. Our process being that we draw together a proposal and submit it for review and acceptance by the Schema steering group, the more detailed and complex it is, the more convincing they will need regarding that complexity plus the more positive indications towards broad potential adoption will be required. It is a fairly easy argument to suggest Course & CourseInstance will be taken up by a potentially large number of academic institutions of all types. How many will be inspired to, or capable of, publishing their course structures at the same time is a very different question. My recommendation is that we step back for a moment and identify what would be in a 1.0 proposal - complete and submit that in the near future. Such an addition to Schema would be a major step forward from where we are now. Moving on to a more detailed version 2.0, taking into account to reactions, feedback, and compromises we may have to make submitting 1.0 this should be overall a smother process. One final thought. A basic (1.0) Course proposal may well fit best into the core Schema.org vocabulary, with education extensions adding domain specific capability later. ~Richard. Richard Wallis Founder, Data Liberate http://dataliberate.com Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis Twitter: @rjw
Received on Thursday, 2 June 2016 11:01:03 UTC