Proposal: starting document for what we cover.

Hello all
In our kick-off meeting Dan proposed that we use the Schema for Courses 
[https://goo.gl/DnTTsb] document with use case sketches to identify what 
we wanted the schema course extension to cover.

I offered to simplify this a little and put it on the Community Group 
wiki, which I have done, see:
https://www.w3.org/community/schema-course-extend/wiki/Outline_use_cases

The idea is that these outline use cases would describe what we want the 
proposal to cover. We would be able to provide an example, based 
(ideally) on data from a real website, of how the proposal provided 
markup for the information required for that use case.

*Question:* does anyone object to this approach?  If so please let us 
know in the next few days.

If no one objects to the overall approach, we might want to discuss some 
use cases (including suggesting additions) in more detail. I think for 
most of them it should be pretty straightforward to show how current 
proposals meet them.
*
**Question:* We have a choice between W3C group wiki and google docs for 
working docs. I don't want to have a document live on both. Which do you 
prefer?

Phil


-- 
Phil Barker           @philbarker
LRMI, Cetis, ICBL     http://people.pjjk.net/phil
Heriot-Watt University

Workflow: http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/~philb/workflow/



----- 
We invite research leaders and ambitious early career researchers to 
join us in leading and driving research in key inter-disciplinary themes. 
Please see www.hw.ac.uk/researchleaders for further information and how
to apply.

Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity
registered under charity number SC000278.