- From: Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 15:59:18 +0000
- To: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
- Cc: public-schema-course-extend@w3.org
- Message-ID: <56BB5E56.8010204@hw.ac.uk>
On 10/02/2016 15:54, Richard Wallis wrote: > > On 10 February 2016 at 15:44, Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk > <mailto:phil.barker@hw.ac.uk>> wrote: > > Thanks Richard, I had wondered about the relationship between > CourseOffering and the existing Offer type. After thinking about > Alan Paulls query around cost, I think they might be different > things. A single CouseOffering might have several costs, depending > on the student. So they would be distinct instances of > schema.org:Offer but not of CourseOffering. > > > Is that different to a an organization Offer[ing] the same service to > different people at different costs dependant on eligibility - > separate offers describing the cost of a haircut for children, adults, > and retired persons? No, it's not the existence of different Offers that I doubt, it's what it being offered. I think that was probably clearer the further you get down the message > That would suggest to me that CourseOffering would have the > (repeatable) schema.org:offers property. > > > If we do end up with what you describe I get the feeling we should be > concerned about the overuse of the words offer and offering and how > it might impact understandability. Indeed. Phil > A definition of CourseOffering might help. Several other specs > make the distinction between abstract and concrete aspects of > courses the relevant definitions are: > XCRI-CAP BS 8581-1:2012 : “the course offered at a specific time > and place, or through specific media” > > MLO-Advertising CWA 15903 : "A single occurrence of a learning > opportunity. Unlike a Learning Opportunity Specification, a > Learning Opportunity Instance is not abstract, may be bound to > particular dates or locations, and may be applied for or > participated in by learners." > > CEDS: "A setting in which organized instruction of course content > is provided to one or more students for a given period of time. > Note: A Course may be offered to more than one Course Section. > Instruction may be delivered in person by one or more instructors > or via a different medium. Sections that share space should be > considered as separate Course Sections if they function as > separate units for more than 50 percent of the time." > > One option would be to define CourseOffering in such a way that it > match schema.org <http://schema.org>'s Offer, something like: "the > course offered at a specific time and place, or through specific > media, at a specific price depending on the learner" But I don't > like this: it would lead to unnecessary duplication of all the > properties of a CourseOffering except for price. > > It's also worth considering whether the name CourseOffering is a > poor choice of name if it leads to confusing assertions like > schema.org:CourseOffering schema.org:offers schema.org:Offer. > > > As I said above before reading this ;-) > > > Phil > > -- Phil Barker @philbarker LRMI, Cetis, ICBL http://people.pjjk.net/phil Heriot-Watt University Workflow: http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/~philb/workflow/ ----- We invite research leaders and ambitious early career researchers to join us in leading and driving research in key inter-disciplinary themes. Please see www.hw.ac.uk/researchleaders for further information and how to apply. Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity registered under charity number SC000278.
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 15:59:55 UTC