Re: kamikaze web dev?

Better yet;  how is the opposite made clearly, defensibly true - for
those engaged in - problems - seeking a better outcome for humanity (/ our
biosphere), which requires socio-economic semantics; but they may not exist
or function well...

per point; of temporal web / etc...

obviously(?), engaging others to 'commit' to works that are defined in such
a way that is likely to harm them (in support of how others profit); is
dishonourable, at a minimum...

maybe i don't understand.  i am mindful that 'slave' has migrated to be
often termed 'illegal' (ie: illegal worker), which is now seemingly
migrating to the term 'consumer' (ie: user of 'free online services'), but
it is complicated stuff...  Do we need an international audit on it?  IDK...

timothy holborn

On Tue, 18 May 2021 at 04:08, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
wrote:

> do we need to define a kamikaze W(eb)orld Dev strategy to ensure a better
> world for others?
>
> let me know.  Feels like, i've been taught what that means, have examples
> of others, and can 'on-board' others...
>
> the problem I see with the method; is about how the memorials would need
> to illustrate a fantasy...
>
> 'new world order' perhaps? but its not up to me...  its about reality
> check tech.  vs. entrenched advocates for something else...  imo.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Timothy Holborn
>