Re: A Quick Note on WebID history from Henry Story on 2021-08-13 (public-rww@w3.org from August 2021)

From: Henry Story <henry.story@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 17:29:53 +0200
To: Aaron Coburn <acoburn@apache.org>
Cc: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>, Read-Write-Web <public-rww@w3.org>
Message-Id: <578E7E58-993A-4E6C-AA4C-E34F23B256AA@gmail.com>

> On 13. Aug 2021, at 17:08, Aaron Coburn <acoburn@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> From my perspective, if the WebID draft simply required "an RDF serialization" rather than a particular serialization, this would allay my principal concern.

From what I hear this is your concern and I think Kingsley’s concern.
It does not seem to be a big deal for me. 

You are welcome to open an issue on the WebID issue DB here:

https://github.com/w3c/webid

We can see if this creates issues for other deployments, which should help determine 
how to proceed. 

I think the spec specifies a default Turtle serialization when there is no mime type
request.

Henry

Received on Friday, 13 August 2021 15:31:14 UTC